Sujet : Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?
De : Muttley (at) *nospam* DastardlyHQ.org
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 25. Mar 2025, 15:46:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vrufju$3i02s$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:09:21 +0000
bart <
bc@freeuk.com> wibbled:
On 25/03/2025 08:40, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
>
>
For that matter, why do YOU use a makefile when your full build is only
0.8 seconds?
Modularising code is far more than just about compilation speed which you'd
know if you had anything approaching a clue.
>
You can modularise code without also needing a makefile!
IYYM you can build modularised code without it. Sure , sometimes, so long as
the modules don't have varying compilation dependencies. But then you end up
rebuilding everything.
The stone age is where they used one huge source file for a program.
>
Maybe they also used one huge binary for a program.
Listen sonny, in large projects in companies - ie not the toy code you work
on in your bedroom - different people will have checked out seperate modules
and be working on them at any one time. Thats a lot simpler than having one
huge source file that then has a boatload of merge issues when a dozen people
all try to check their changes back in.
You're either fucking stupid or an incredibly successful troll.
>
No matter how many facts you're given you ignore the ones you don't like
and twist things around to make some smart-ass comment.
When you get a dev job in the real world get back to me.