Sujet : Re: Integral types and own type definitions (was Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?)
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 26. Mar 2025, 16:55:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <86v7rviy6p.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Michael S <
already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:45:50 +0000
Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
>
On 26/03/2025 14:01, Michael S wrote:
>
But your school in UK taught you the same meaning of 'whole
numbers' as James's school in US.
>
What makes you think so?
>
It seems, he said it himself in one of replies.
>
Mine certainly didn't.
>
But you are significantly older than David. Not sure about James.
Unfortunately the sub-conversation has turned into a debate
about what the phrase "whole numbers" does or should mean.
The important point is that different people understand it
differently, and consequently "whole numbers" is not a good
substitute for the word "integers".