Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"

David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
[...]

It is bold, perhaps, but there are certainly good reasons.  As far as
I can see we have some keywords that have dropped their
underscore-capital form:
>
alignas
alignof
bool
static_assert
thread_local

The underscore-capital forms still exist as alternate spellings.
Dropping _Bool et al would have broken existing code.

And we have some new ones :
>
constexpr
false
nullptr
true
typeof
typeof_unequal

That last one is "typeof_unqual".

[...]

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */