Re: do { quit; } else { }

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: do { quit; } else { }
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 06. Apr 2025, 14:26:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20250406162607.0000657a@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 05:47:47 -0700
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:

Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> writes:
 
Em 4/4/2025 5:48 PM, Tim Rentsch escreveu:
 
Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> writes:
 
   What do you think of this control block?
>
   do
   {
      FILE f = fopen("file.txt", "r");
>
      if (f == NULL) quit; /*goes to else part*/
>
      /*success here*/
      for (int i =0; i < 10; i++){
          ...
          if (error) quit;
      }
>
   }
   else
   {
      /*some error*/
   } 
>
I think it doesn't belong in comp.lang.c.
>
I also think you have been participating in comp.lang.c
long enough to know better.  Kindly take your language
fantasies somewhere else. 
>
I think the only reason you're saying that is because it's not
implemented in GCC, Clang, or maybe even MSVC. 
 
You are wrong.  I responded because there is nothing in
your posting that is suitable for comp.lang.c. 
 
I've never seen you complain about any GCC extensions here. 
 
I don't remember seeing any posting in comp.lang.c that
discusses a gcc extension and nothing else.  There are
plenty of postings that mention gcc extensions in passing,
along with other material that talks about C, but never
one that discusses gcc extensions exclusively.
 
Furthermore, even if there had been a posting that concerns
only a gcc extension and nothing else, and is one I didn't
respond to, that doesn't excuse your action.  It isn't like
this is the first time you have posted something here that
is not about C but only about your fantasy language, and
also not the first time the unsuitability of such postings
has been pointed out.  You're a repeat offender.  So stop
pretending you are being picked on for no reason.

More interesting question than the one above is: why post of Alexis
from 3 months ago named "Opinion on defer" is on topic in c.l.c ?
How exactly can we draw a line between two cases?



Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Apr 25 * do { quit; } else { }258Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }2bart
4 Apr 25 i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }11Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 ii `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Apr 25 i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 ii+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 iii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Thiago Adams
8 Apr 25 ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1candycanearter07
5 Apr 25 i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Janis Papanagnou
5 Apr 25 i +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Janis Papanagnou
6 Apr 25 i `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Michael S
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }242Tim Rentsch
4 Apr 25 i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }241Thiago Adams
6 Apr 25 i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }240Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }222Michael S
6 Apr 25 i  i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }221Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i  i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }220Michael S
7 Apr 25 i  i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }219Tim Rentsch
7 Apr 25 i  i   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }218Michael S
7 Apr 25 i  i    +* Re: do { quit; } else { }214bart
8 Apr 25 i  i    i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }213David Brown
8 Apr 25 i  i    i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }212bart
8 Apr 25 i  i    i  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }207David Brown
8 Apr 25 i  i    i  i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }206bart
8 Apr 25 i  i    i  i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }58Tim Rentsch
8 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }57bart
8 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }54Tim Rentsch
8 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }53bart
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }52Tim Rentsch
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }51bart
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i   +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i   +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }48Tim Rentsch
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }47bart
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     +* Re: do { quit; } else { }45Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Michael S
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }42bart
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }28Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }27bart
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     i i +* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]16bart
10 Apr23:18 i  i    i  i i i     i i i+* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]14Janis Papanagnou
11 Apr00:10 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii`* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]13bart
11 Apr01:41 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
11 Apr03:45 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr09:14 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]10David Brown
11 Apr12:32 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii  `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]9bart
11 Apr12:50 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii   +* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]5Michael S
11 Apr12:56 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii   i`* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]4bart
11 Apr13:12 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii   i `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]3Michael S
11 Apr14:12 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii   i  +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Janis Papanagnou
11 Apr15:55 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii   i  `- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1bart
11 Apr14:02 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii   +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1David Brown
11 Apr18:03 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii   +- Re: Endless complaints1Tim Rentsch
11 Apr20:26 i  i    i  i i i     i i ii   `- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
10 Apr23:27 i  i    i  i i i     i i i`- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
10 Apr23:23 i  i    i  i i i     i i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }10Keith Thompson
11 Apr00:49 i  i    i  i i i     i i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }9bart
11 Apr01:59 i  i    i  i i i     i i   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }8Keith Thompson
11 Apr12:26 i  i    i  i i i     i i    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }7Michael S
11 Apr15:11 i  i    i  i i i     i i     +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
11 Apr18:22 i  i    i  i i i     i i     +* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr20:46 i  i    i  i i i     i i     i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2bart
11 Apr22:10 i  i    i  i i i     i i     ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
13 Apr18:45 i  i    i  i i i     i i     i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Michael S
11 Apr19:20 i  i    i  i i i     i i     `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }13Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     i  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }10bart
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     i  i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr00:02 i  i    i  i i i     i  ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
11 Apr02:52 i  i    i  i i i     i  i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }5Tim Rentsch
11 Apr04:51 i  i    i  i i i     i  ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Keith Thompson
11 Apr06:55 i  i    i  i i i     i  ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Tim Rentsch
11 Apr07:00 i  i    i  i i i     i  ii  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Keith Thompson
11 Apr12:14 i  i    i  i i i     i  ii   `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
11 Apr05:20 i  i    i  i i i     i  i+- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
11 Apr05:24 i  i    i  i i i     i  i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     i  +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
10 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i i     i  `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr18:07 i  i    i  i i i     `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Richard Damon
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i i `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }147David Brown
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Michael S
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  i+- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
11 Apr17:27 i  i    i  i  i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1James Kuyper
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Michael S
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Michael S
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }7bart
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }6David Brown
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }5bart
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  i  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }2David Brown
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  i  i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
11 Apr01:40 i  i    i  i  i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }2James Kuyper
11 Apr17:20 i  i    i  i  i   `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1James Kuyper
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }132Janis Papanagnou
8 Apr 25 i  i    i  +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
9 Apr 25 i  i    i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Ike Naar
8 Apr 25 i  i    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }17Michael S
6 Apr 25 +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Apr 25 `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal