Re: do { quit; } else { }

On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 07:32:16 -0700
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
 

On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 05:47:47 -0700
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
 

>
Furthermore, even if there had been a posting that concerns
only a gcc extension and nothing else, and is one I didn't
respond to, that doesn't excuse your action.  It isn't like
this is the first time you have posted something here that
is not about C but only about your fantasy language, and
also not the first time the unsuitability of such postings
has been pointed out.  You're a repeat offender.  So stop
pretending you are being picked on for no reason. 

>
Could you recommend a more appropriate place for Thiago and others
where they can discuss C-like fantasy languages? 

 
The newsgroup comp.lang.misc seems like a natural candidate.
I don't know if comp.lang.misc has an official charter, but at
least to me new features of any widely used programming language
would appear to fall under the umbrella of comp.lang.misc.

My question was not completely abstract.
I did consider starting a discussion about possibility of inclusion of
stackless co-routines into one of the future editions of C.
Naturally, my ideas at this state are extremely in-concrete, much more
so then the post of Thiago Adams that started this thread.
So, if I ever come to it, which by itself is not very likely, do you
think that comp.lang.misc would be better place than comp.lang.c ?