Sujet : Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 09. Apr 2025, 23:09:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <871pu1q96r.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+
ng@hotmail.com> writes:
On 09.04.2025 11:01, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:53:45 +0300
Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wibbled:
>
=D7=A8=D7=91=D7=91=D7=94=20
Any chance of using utf8 rather than whatever the hell encoding this is.
>
Could it be that your newsreader garbled that? Probably because
it doesn't expect or knows how to decode UTF-8 encoded Hebrew?
The fact that it's Hebrew should be irrelevant. UTF-8 encoded Hebrew,
as far as any newsreader is concerned, is just UTF-8. It only has to
copy it when posting in UTF-8, or translate it to some other encoding
if (unwisely) it's posting in something other than UTF-8. If posting in
ASCII, a newsreader might use some encoding like the =D7... we see
above.
The article that garbled the Hebrew characters has no header lines
indicating what the article's encoding is or which newsreader was used.
-- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.comvoid Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */