Liste des Groupes | Revenir à cl fortran |
On 04/10/2024 21:36, Gary Scott wrote:Yes. I've however never found the fixed length strings to be a major hindrance. I know exactly how they work and have been able to adequately mimic/store variable length strings within reasonably sized fixed length buffers (various methods). I really liked the flexibility of string/text processing of IBM's DCF/Script/GML. How that was powerful string handling.On 10/4/2024 3:04 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:Yes but for practical purposes it only works for scalars, not arrays. Since nearly all the rest of Fortran is based on the (unstated, but widely-understood) principle that arrays are first-class objects, this is a real pity.On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:13:52 +0200, R Daneel Olivaw wrote:>
>but not as friendly as>
character*28 txthdr /'Text header, with a comma ' /
With all these additions to Fortran, I keep wondering “when will they
finish reinventing PL/I?”. Because at an early point in the development of
PL/I, they were going to call it “FORTRAN VI”.
>
One PL/I feature still missing from Fortran is VARYING strings.
Fortran does have a form of varying string...just not super convenient to use in the general case.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.