Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl fortran 
Sujet : Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???
De : sgk (at) *nospam* REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu (Steven G. Kargl)
Groupes : comp.lang.fortran
Date : 12. Jan 2025, 23:20:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vm1f81$1e77b$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:11:47 -0800, baf wrote:

On 1/10/2025 3:01 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Hm, OK.   I'm not familiar with how Simply Fortran operates; they do
not cooperate with the gfortran team (but rather make money off the
work of volunteers). If you have questions regarding teir toolbox,
this is best addressed to them.
 
 
It is not strictly true that the Simply Fortran folks make money off the
work of volunteers. They do not charge for the use of gfortran. Anyone
can install their software for free, and that installation provides
gfortran (and friends) that can be accessed from the command line
without any license from Simply Fortran. What they do charge for is
their IDE.

I suppose that is one way to look at the situation. OTOH,
Simply Fortran would not exist if gfortran did not exist.
SF's homepage does not even bother to acknowledge that the
Fortran compiler is in fact gfortran.  One does find on the
'Features' page: "Simply Fortran has been designed from the
start with GNU Fortran integration as the primary goal."
Additionally, there is no easily found information concerning
the actual version of GCC that comes with SF.

I suspect that Thomas's point is that the SF developer(s)
have not sent bug reports, patches to fix bugs, engaged
with any of gfortran's main contributors, or even said
"Thank you".  Sure, the GPL does not require such behavior,
but the current lack of interaction appears to be somewhat
discourteous.

--
steve

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Jan 25 * nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???22Lynn McGuire
7 Jan 25 +* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???16Thomas Koenig
8 Jan 25 i+* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???5Lynn McGuire
8 Jan 25 ii`* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???4Thomas Koenig
8 Jan 25 ii `* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???3Lynn McGuire
8 Jan 25 ii  `* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???2Thomas Koenig
8 Jan 25 ii   `- Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???1Steven G. Kargl
10 Jan 25 i`* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???10Lynn McGuire
10 Jan 25 i `* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???9Thomas Koenig
10 Jan 25 i  `* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???8Lynn McGuire
11 Jan 25 i   `* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???7Thomas Koenig
11 Jan 25 i    +* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???2Lynn McGuire
11 Jan 25 i    i`- Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???1Thomas Koenig
12 Jan 25 i    `* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???4baf
12 Jan 25 i     +- Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???1Lynn McGuire
12 Jan 25 i     `* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???2Steven G. Kargl
13 Jan 25 i      `- Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???1baf
7 Jan 25 +- Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???1Steven G. Kargl
14 Jan 25 `* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???4Lynn McGuire
14 Jan 25  `* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???3Thomas Koenig
15 Jan 25   `* Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???2Lynn McGuire
15 Jan 25    `- Re: nasty link problem with Gfortran and G++ (C++) ???1Thomas Koenig

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal