Re: X in every language syndrome

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl lisp 
Sujet : Re: X in every language syndrome
De : gneuner2 (at) *nospam* comcast.net (George Neuner)
Groupes : comp.lang.lisp
Date : 08. Jul 2024, 18:13:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <123o8j9cfdn9f9nvh1vecm1tere9dbuns0@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 24 May 2020 00:30:21 -0600, Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com>
wrote:

...
  By the way, these "use" directives are about as low
level as you can get. Why doesn't the system load whatever is used? Is
your toy designed for less then megabyte memory machines. [There's two
questions buried in here.]

Stupid question: why do you consider Scheme using a library to be more
"low level" than Lisp using a package?

Gauche is a bit odd in that it has both "use" and "require", but the
difference is only syntax. Gauche has a culture of distinguishing use
of the built-in extensions ("use") vs other libraries ("require").

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Jul 24 * Re: X in every language syndrome9George Neuner
9 Jul 24 `* Re: X in every language syndrome8Kaz Kylheku
10 Jul 24  `* Re: X in every language syndrome7George Neuner
11 Jul 24   `* Re: X in every language syndrome6Paul Rubin
12 Jul 24    `* Re: X in every language syndrome5George Neuner
12 Jul 24     `* Re: X in every language syndrome4George Neuner
12 Jul 24      `* Re: X in every language syndrome3Nils M Holm
14 Jul 24       `* Re: X in every language syndrome2George Neuner
15 Jul 24        `- Re: X in every language syndrome1Nils M Holm

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal