Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl lisp 
Sujet : Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages
De : commodorejohn (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John Ames)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell comp.unix.programmer comp.lang.misc
Date : 29. Mar 2024, 17:44:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240329084454.0000090f@gmail.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 09:55:33 -0000 (UTC)
Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote:

My rule of thimb is that a scripting language is one whereby the
source code can be run immediately by the interpreter, eg perl,
python, regardless of what happens internally. A full fledged
programming language is one that requires a compile/debug/link step
first with the compiler and runtime (if required) being seperate. eg
Java, C

By *that* logic, even Lisp and Forth don't count as "full-fledged
programming languages" o_O Johanne's definition of a "scripting
language" as a DSL designed for directing the actions of the operating
system makes much more sense, IMHO.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Sep 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal