Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl lisp 
Sujet : Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.
De : ben.usenet (at) *nospam* bsb.me.uk (Ben Bacarisse)
Groupes : comp.lang.lisp
Date : 17. Apr 2024, 18:44:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <87pluondm6.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
Was it a matter of timing, then? Perl came along at just the point where
the hardware was powerful enough to take the complexities of regular
expressions in its stride, so that’s when the whole idea really took off.
>
Unix had regular expressions because Thompson's QED editor on some weird
old GE(?) minicomputer had had them.  It compiled the regexex into
machine code, iirc.  Perl was sort of Awk on steroids and Awk also had
regexes.  I think regexes per se were never very cpu or memory hungry.
>
Snobol and Spitbol didn't have regexes.  They did pattern matching by
brute force backtracking.  By that era though, computers had much more
memory than they did when Lisp 2 was happening.

SNOBOL's patterns were much more "procedural" than REs.  For example,
you could implement Russell's paradox in SNOBOL: a pattern that matches
only those patterns that don't match themselves.

--
Ben.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Apr 24 * Lisp history: IF, etc.56Alan Bawden
2 Apr 24 +- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Kaz Kylheku
3 Apr 24 +- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Gijs Hillenius
3 Apr 24 +- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Gijs Hillenius
3 Apr 24 +* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.49Madhu
3 Apr 24 i`* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.48Alan Bawden
3 Apr 24 i +* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.35Paul Rubin
3 Apr 24 i i`* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.34Alan Bawden
4 Apr 24 i i +* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.32Paul Rubin
4 Apr 24 i i i+* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Apr 24 i i ii+* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.3Axel Reichert
4 Apr 24 i i iii+- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Apr 24 i i iii`- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Paul Rubin
4 Apr 24 i i ii`- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 24 i i i`* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.26Alan Bawden
5 Apr 24 i i i `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.25Paul Rubin
5 Apr 24 i i i  `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.24Julieta Shem
5 Apr 24 i i i   +- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Julieta Shem
6 Apr 24 i i i   +- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Apr 24 i i i   `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.21Paul Rubin
16 Apr 24 i i i    `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.20Jeff Barnett
16 Apr 24 i i i     +* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Apr 24 i i i     i`- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Jeff Barnett
16 Apr 24 i i i     +* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.16Paul Rubin
16 Apr 24 i i i     i`* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.15Jeff Barnett
16 Apr 24 i i i     i `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.14Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Apr 24 i i i     i  +* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.12Paul Rubin
17 Apr 24 i i i     i  i`* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Apr 24 i i i     i  i `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.10Paul Rubin
17 Apr 24 i i i     i  i  `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.9Jeff Barnett
17 Apr 24 i i i     i  i   `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Apr 24 i i i     i  i    `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.7Paul Rubin
17 Apr 24 i i i     i  i     +* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.3Madhu
18 Apr 24 i i i     i  i     i`* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Apr 24 i i i     i  i     i `- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Paul Rubin
17 Apr 24 i i i     i  i     `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.3Ben Bacarisse
18 Apr 24 i i i     i  i      `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Apr 24 i i i     i  i       `- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Stefan Monnier
17 Apr 24 i i i     i  `- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Jeff Barnett
17 Apr 24 i i i     `- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Stefan Ram
4 Apr 24 i i `- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Ben Bacarisse
3 Apr 24 i +* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.7Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 24 i i+* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.5Alan Bawden
4 Apr 24 i ii+* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.3Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 24 i iii`* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.2Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 24 i iii `- on levels of disappointment (Was: Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.)1Julieta Shem
4 Apr 24 i ii`- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Julieta Shem
5 Apr 24 i i`- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Spiros Bousbouras
4 Apr 24 i +* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Apr 24 i i`* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.2Alan Bawden
4 Apr 24 i i `- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Kaz Kylheku
12 Apr 24 i `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.2Alan Bawden
12 Apr 24 i  `- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Apr 24 `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.3Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 24  `* Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.2Alan Bawden
4 Apr 24   `- Re: Lisp history: IF, etc.1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal