Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl lisp 
Sujet : Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages
De : Muttley (at) *nospam* dastardlyhq.com
Groupes : comp.unix.shell comp.unix.programmer comp.lang.misc
Date : 29. Mar 2024, 18:02:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uu6om5$cmv8$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 08:44:54 -0700
John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 09:55:33 -0000 (UTC)
Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
>
My rule of thimb is that a scripting language is one whereby the
source code can be run immediately by the interpreter, eg perl,
python, regardless of what happens internally. A full fledged
programming language is one that requires a compile/debug/link step
first with the compiler and runtime (if required) being seperate. eg
Java, C
>
By *that* logic, even Lisp and Forth don't count as "full-fledged
programming languages" o_O Johanne's definition of a "scripting

As a counter point, good luck writing a device driver in lisp. Forth maybe,
no idea.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Sep 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal