Re: (3-digit combination) was:

Madhu <enometh@meer.net> writes:

(of course i think there is no advantage in calling solver
over brute forcing it in lisp)

For 3 or 4 digits brute force is obviously fine.  In that pdf that I
posted, the solver approach worked ok at 12 digits, which is a bit much
for brute force.

also this produces 2 results (0 6 2) and (0 4 2) -- the (0 4 2) result

042 was the "correct" solution to the original problem.  I don't know
the situation with 062.