Re: on racket and other Lisps

Some entity, AKA "De ongekruisigde (ds.)" <ongekruisigde@gekruisigden.invalid>,
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)

Worth noting the fundamental split between “Lisp-1” members of the family
and “Lisp-2”. Traditional Lisps (as embodied by Common Lisp) are “Lisp-2”
Lisps, while Scheme is the originator of the “Lisp-1” branch.

>
I always thought Racket via Scheme was the Lisp-1 branch and the
other ones the Lisp-2 branch. ;-)

It does not matter whether you call it another dialect or language.
For any non initiated it's just as incomprehensible as a speech
impediment.

73's
Cor
--

Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill
       defined barely usable re-implementation of half of common-lisp
       - 'someone