Sujet : Re: Editor of choice
De : ongekruisigde (at) *nospam* gekruisigden.invalid (De ongekruisigde (ds.))
Groupes : comp.lang.lispDate : 01. Jun 2024, 12:21:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Ongekruisigden
Message-ID : <v3esmq$2nqd1$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-05-31, Cor <
cornews@clsnet.nl> wrote:
Some entity, AKA Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org>,
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
>
steve <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> writes:
>
I still use the GNU EMACS.
>
Which 'other' editor?
Emacs with evil-mode (*) is as far as anyone should go!
The vi keymappings are useful on mobile devices.
The use of any other editor is concidered pennance by te church of EMACS
hear! hear!
-- De Kerk van Roodkapje (KvR) belijdt de enige ware religie! DeRode Macht van Roodkapje is wetenschappelijk onderzocht enbevestigd (google roodverschuiving).
Editor of choice
Re: Editor of choice
