Sujet : Re: Why not a setf-able NIL ?
De : Nobody447095 (at) *nospam* here-nor-there.org (B. Pym)
Groupes : comp.lang.lispDate : 15. Jul 2024, 22:29:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v740rp$rp3d$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : XanaNews/1.18.1.6
Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
You must be very very sad. I know of no programming language
allowing you to redefined/reassing 42. I suppose you would like to do
(let ((42 101010)) (* 42 2)) too...
Ignorance.
Forth:
: 42 233 ; ok
42 2 * . 466 ok
Understand?
Re: Why not a setf-able NIL ?