Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl lisp 
Sujet : Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?
De : 643-408-1753 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Groupes : comp.lang.lisp
Date : 08. Aug 2024, 21:19:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240808121834.315@kylheku.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
On 2024-08-08, Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> wrote:
As a start, did you you try defining collatz and clen with defsubst? Did
you try using declarations and their cousins? And did your CL system
provide a decent, declaration-sensitive compiler?

defsubst is some Emacs Lisp thing for inline functions.

In Common Lisp, it's (declaim (inline ...)).

--
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Aug 24 * Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?9Paul Rubin
8 Aug 24 +* Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?5Jeff Barnett
8 Aug 24 i+* Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?2Kaz Kylheku
8 Aug 24 ii`- Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?1Jeff Barnett
10 Aug 24 i`* Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?2Paul Rubin
11 Aug 24 i `- Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?1David De La Harpe Golden
8 Aug 24 +- Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?1David De La Harpe Golden
11 Aug 24 `* Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?2steve g
13 Aug 24  `- Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?1Paul Rubin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal