Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl lisp 
Sujet : Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?
De : jbb (at) *nospam* notatt.com (Jeff Barnett)
Groupes : comp.lang.lisp
Date : 08. Aug 2024, 23:26:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v93d66$8oab$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/8/2024 1:19 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2024-08-08, Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> wrote:
As a start, did you you try defining collatz and clen with defsubst? Did
you try using declarations and their cousins? And did your CL system
provide a decent, declaration-sensitive compiler?
 defsubst is some Emacs Lisp thing for inline functions.
 In Common Lisp, it's (declaim (inline ...)).
I thought that defsubst was in both the Symbolics' implementation of CL and Allegro's. It's been a while so I might have misremembered. Thanks for correction.
--
Jeff Barnett

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Aug 24 * Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?9Paul Rubin
8 Aug 24 +* Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?5Jeff Barnett
8 Aug 24 i+* Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?2Kaz Kylheku
8 Aug 24 ii`- Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?1Jeff Barnett
10 Aug 24 i`* Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?2Paul Rubin
11 Aug 24 i `- Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?1David De La Harpe Golden
8 Aug 24 +- Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?1David De La Harpe Golden
11 Aug 24 `* Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?2steve g
13 Aug 24  `- Re: Optimization flag for unchecked fixnums in SBCL?1Paul Rubin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal