Re: Choosing between Lisps and Schemes

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl lisp 
Sujet : Re: Choosing between Lisps and Schemes
De : ram (at) *nospam* zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Groupes : comp.lang.lisp
Date : 11. Jan 2024, 11:12:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Stefan Ram
Message-ID : <LISP-20240111111021@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
And also because their modern incarnations are quite different from how
they were in the early days.

  I'm just following my sentimentality when choosing a LISP dialect.
  In other words, it has to be as similar as possible to the LISP
  I used to write simple functions for symbolic differentiation
  on my Pet 2001 when I was young. Something like this:

( SETQ DIFF
  ( LAMBDA( X )
    ( COND
      ( ( ATOMP X )
        ( COND
          ( ( = X 'X )
            1 )
          ( T
            0 )))
      ( T
        ( COND
          ( ( =( CAR X )'SUM )
            ( LIST 'SUM( DIFF( CADR X ))( DIFF( CADDR X )))))))))

  .


Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Jan 24 * Re: Choosing between Lisps and Schemes3Stefan Ram
12 Jan 24 `* Re: Choosing between Lisps and Schemes2Stefan Ram
12 Jan 24  `- Re: Choosing between Lisps and Schemes1Stefan Ram

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal