Re: Is Lexical Binding The Norm Yet?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl lisp 
Sujet : Re: Is Lexical Binding The Norm Yet?
De : ram (at) *nospam* zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Groupes : comp.lang.lisp
Date : 15. Jan 2024, 10:46:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Stefan Ram
Message-ID : <funarg-20240115104452@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
I recall in McCarthy’s memoir of the origins of Lisp, he thought the
scoping issue (the “FUNARG problem”, I think he called it) was a simple
coding bug, and got one of his grad students to fix it.

  Stoyan wrote:

|McCarthy admits that he underestimated the problem. "I must
|confess that I regarded this difficulty as just a bug and
|expressed confidence that Steve Russell would soon fix it..."

  . Stoyan commented:

|The funarg event proves that McCarthy was now far from his
|LISP. He won the theoretical battle und searched for the next
|field. The mathematical theory of computation, time sharing,
|and proof checking were his new interests. LISP lost first
|priority.

  .


Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jan 24 o Re: Is Lexical Binding The Norm Yet?1Stefan Ram

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal