Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages

cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) wrote or quoted:

Your claim that "machine language" is not a "language" is simply
not true.

  Machine language is a language.

  (It might not be a /formal/ language when the specification
  is not definite. For example, when one says, "6502", are the
  "undocumented" opcodes a part of this language or not? So, for
  a formal language, you have to make sure that it's definite.)

  Not related to unix. So, not,

Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc

  , but,

Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc

  .