Re: (IIII vs. IV) -- (the clock-face choice) -- (It is called by name, not by value)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl misc 
Sujet : Re: (IIII vs. IV) -- (the clock-face choice) -- (It is called by name, not by value)
De : yeti (at) *nospam* tilde.institute (yeti)
Groupes : comp.lang.misc
Date : 20. Mar 2024, 08:25:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Democratic Order of Pirates International (DOPI)
Message-ID : <87bk79to6n.fsf@tilde.institute>
References : 1
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:

"The numerical notation of 4 is IV in Roman numerals. You probably think
so, too.    However, there are many cases where IIII is used at the 4:00
position on the dial plates of clocks that use Roman numerals."
>
                  Brought to you by the Seiko museum.
                     https://museum.seiko.co.jp/en/knowledge/trivia02/

Stand-up Maths
How Roman numerals broke the official dog database.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMxoGqsmk5Y>

;-D

--
I do not bite, I just want to play.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Mar 24 o Re: (IIII vs. IV) -- (the clock-face choice) -- (It is called by name, not by value)1yeti

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal