What about the Holy Grail? (Was: Scryer Prolog is dead now?)

Somebody wondered on SWI discourse:
 > Prolog and the holy grail :+1:
This slogan didn’t grow in my backyard. See for example here:
Constraint Programming: In Pursuit of the Holy Grail
Roman Barták - 1999
https://ktiml.mff.cuni.cz/~bartak/downloads/WDS99.pdf
But now that Scryer Prolog is dead, some of their 270 GitHub
issues deals with performance problems(*) of their various CLPs,
I guess they need new a fresh start.
(*) Example:
https://github.com/mthom/scryer-prolog/issues/1730
Mild Shock schrieb:

Anybody tried to combine raylib with SWI-Prolog.
Like programming snake or something? Like here:
 Raylib bindings to Scryer Prolog using library(ffi)
https://github.com/aarroyoc/raylib-prolog
 Strange: Somehow I have the feeling Scryer Prolog is
in a hybernation now, they sit on 270 issues and there
 are no code changes anymore? Is it dead now?
 Mild Shock schrieb:

Especially since good old FORTRAN has
made a new appearance:
>
TIOBE Index for May 2024
I have received a lot of questions why Fortran entered the top 10
again after more than 20 years. The TIOBE index just publishes
what has been measured.
https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/
>
Why Fortran is back in TIOBE’s top 10
First, Fortran is especially good at numerical analysis and
computational mathematics. Numerical and mathematical
computing is growing because interest in artificial intelligence
is growing, Jansen told TechRepublic in an email.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/tiobe-index-may-2024/