Sujet : Did Lifeware Kill Scryer Prolog CLP(Z) ? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024])
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : comp.lang.prologDate : 26. Jul 2024, 14:38:52
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <v808tc$cuh7$1@solani.org>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Hi,
Did Lifeware Kill Scryer Prolog CLP(Z) ?
Sounds interesting:
Pack modeling a SWI-Prolog pack for mathematical
modellng with constraints on subscripted variables,
developed by François Fages. François Fages. A
Constraint-based Mathematical Modeling Library in
Prolog with Answer Constraint Semantics.
https://lifeware.inria.fr/wiki/Main/SoftwareIn 17th International Symposium on Functional and
Logic Programming, FLOPS 2024, volume 14659 of LNCS.
Springer-Verlag, 2024. [ preprint ]
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17286Does it perform?
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Especially since good old FORTRAN has
made a new appearance:
TIOBE Index for May 2024
I have received a lot of questions why Fortran entered the top 10
again after more than 20 years. The TIOBE index just publishes
what has been measured.
https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/
Why Fortran is back in TIOBE’s top 10
First, Fortran is especially good at numerical analysis and
computational mathematics. Numerical and mathematical
computing is growing because interest in artificial intelligence
is growing, Jansen told TechRepublic in an email.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/tiobe-index-may-2024/