Re: Is it that worse with GNU Prolog? (Was: Affero General Public License (AGPL))

On 24/11/2024 04:25, Mild Shock wrote:

You want a GNU license, still you can demonstrate
that GNU licensing system failed in the case of
GNU Prolog to create a vital community especially

I just need a product that works properly, that isn't just spaghetti code at all levels, and from a team/company that doesn't pull the rug, or sabotages, or black mails me as soon as I am invested enough.  I could even pay for that, as we used to do for technology when software and developing software was still a professional endeavour.  And GNU has little to do with any failure, except the failure of humanity that humanity is: rather everybody is an MS/Google/Monsanto employee by now.

an interesting fork somewhere that supported Unicode.

That Unicode even enters these discussions is a joke.  I'll just end up writing my own Prolog engine: a GPL-licensed Prolog engine in JS/Wasm, and an open project proper.  Or maybe I'll just switch to Mizar...  You stay tuned: next black Friday.
-Julio