Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Re: Chicken and egg, with curry?)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl prolog 
Sujet : Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Re: Chicken and egg, with curry?)
De : julio (at) *nospam* diegidio.name (Julio Di Egidio)
Groupes : comp.lang.prolog
Date : 03. Jan 2025, 22:14:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vl9jvq$3ui38$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 03/01/2025 22:12, Mild Shock wrote:
Ok I see its repeating my posts to comp.lang.prolog,
because the sci.logic post has a shitty header!
 Fuck Fuck Fuck Julio what are you doing Fuck Fuck Fuck
I set the follow-up to comp.lang.prolog, the specifics of Prolog are not relevant to the general discussion.
Pity you don't know how Usenet works.  And that e.g. one can simply delete locally the spurious messages, so it's no big deal really...
-Julio

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Jan 25 * Re: Chicken and egg, with curry?6Julio Di Egidio
3 Jan 25 +- Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Was: Chicken and egg, with curry?)1Mild Shock
3 Jan 25 +- Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Re: Chicken and egg, with curry?)1Mild Shock
3 Jan 25 `* Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Re: Chicken and egg, with curry?)3Mild Shock
3 Jan 25  `* Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Re: Chicken and egg, with curry?)2Julio Di Egidio
3 Jan 25   `- How compile a DSL, does it need Types? (Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Re: Chicken and egg, with curry?)1Mild Shock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal