The two rules (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl prolog 
Sujet : The two rules (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : comp.lang.prolog
Date : 03. Aug 2024, 23:57:18
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <v8mckd$ojjb$2@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Well we all know about this rule:
- Never ask a woman about her weight
- Never ask a woman about her age
There is a similar rule for philosophers:
- Never ask a philosopher what is cognitive science
- Never ask a philosopher what is formula-as-types
Explanation: They like to be the champions of
pure form like in this paper below, so they
don’t like other disciplines dealing with pure
form or even having pure form on the computer.
"Pure” logic, ontology, and phenomenology
David Woodruff Smith - Revue internationale de philosophie 2003/2
https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-philosophie-2003-2-page-21.htm
Mild Shock schrieb:
 Could be a wake-up call this many participants
already in the commitee, that the whole logic
world was asleep for many years:
 Non-Classical Logics. Theory and Applications XI,
5-8 September 2024, Lodz (Poland)
https://easychair.org/cfp/NCL24
 Why is Minimal Logic at the core of many things?
Because it is the logic of Curry-Howard isomoprhism
for symple types:
 ----------------
Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ A
 Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ B
----------------
Γ ⊢ A → B
 Γ ⊢ A → B           Δ ⊢ A
----------------------------
Γ ∪ Δ ⊢ B
 And funny things can happen, especially when people
hallucinate duality or think symmetry is given, for
example in newer inventions such as λμ-calculus,
 but then omg ~~p => p is nevertheless not provable,
because they forgot an inference rule. LoL
 Recommended reading so far:
 Propositional Logics Related to Heyting’s and Johansson’s
February 2008 - Krister Segerberg
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228036664
 The Logic of Church and Curry
Jonathan P. Seldin - 2009
https://www.sciencedirect.com/handbook/handbook-of-the-history-of-logic/vol/5/suppl/C   Meanwhile I am going back to my tinkering with my
Prolog system, which even provides a more primitive
logic than minimal logic, pure Prolog is minimal
 logic without embedded implication.
 Mild Shock schrieb:
>
Your new Scrum Master is here! - ChatGPT, 2023
https://www.bbntimes.com/companies/ai-will-make-agile-coaches-and-scrum-masters-redundant-in-less-than-2-years >
>
LoL
>
Thomas Alva Edison schrieb am Dienstag, 10. Juli 2018 um 15:28:05 UTC+2:
Prolog Class Signpost - American Style 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxQKltWI0NA
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jul 24 * Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise (Was: The road to Artificial Intelligence)24Mild Shock
5 Jul 24 +* The curse of Negri & Plato (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)3Mild Shock
5 Jul 24 i`* Re: The curse of Negri & Plato (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)2Mild Shock
13 Jul 24 i `- Euklid: Am I a joke to you? (Re: The curse of Negri & Plato)1Mild Shock
5 Jul 24 +* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise (Was: The road to Artificial Intelligence)3Mild Shock
7 Jul 24 i`* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise (Was: The road to Artificial Intelligence)2Mild Shock
7 Jul 24 i `- Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise (Was: The road to Artificial Intelligence)1Mild Shock
12 Jul 24 +* French Philosophy in 2024 (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)4Mild Shock
12 Jul 24 i`* Re: French Philosophy in 2024 (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)3Mild Shock
12 Jul 24 i +- Corona isn't over 2024 (Was: French Philosophy in 2024)1Mild Shock
12 Jul 24 i `- Re: Corona isn't over 2024 (Was: French Philosophy in 2024)1Mild Shock
13 Jul 24 +* The error in Jan von Platos presentation (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)4Mild Shock
13 Jul 24 i`* Re: The error in Jan von Platos presentation (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)3Mild Shock
13 Jul 24 i `* Re: The error in Jan von Platos presentation (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)2Mild Shock
13 Jul 24 i  `- Re: The error in Jan von Platos presentation (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)1Mild Shock
22 Jul 24 +- Distinction between Computation & Derivation (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)1Mild Shock
31 Jul 24 +* Prolegomena by Rappaport (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise (Was: The road to Artificial Intelligence))5Mild Shock
3 Aug 24 i`* 2nd Cognitive Turn ~~> no Bayesian Brain (Re: Prolegomena by Rappaport)4Mild Shock
3 Aug 24 i `* Ok I made a joke, sorry (e: 2nd Cognitive Turn ~~> no Bayesian Brain)3Mild Shock
3 Aug 24 i  `* Re: Ok I made a joke, sorry (e: 2nd Cognitive Turn ~~> no Bayesian Brain)2Mild Shock
3 Aug 24 i   `- bullshit bullshit bullshit (Re: Ok I made a joke, sorry)1Mild Shock
3 Aug 24 +- The two rules (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)1Mild Shock
3 Oct 24 `* "Emotional AI" and "Spiritual AI" (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)2Mild Shock
3 Oct 24  `- Oh shit, too late! (Re: "Emotional AI" and "Spiritual AI" (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise))1Mild Shock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal