Re: Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1)

Sujet : Re: Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1)
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : comp.lang.prolog
Date : 11. Aug 2024, 13:46:24

Autres entêtes

Message-ID : <v9abr0$1383s$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2

Ok, when I listed these two tomb stones,
this wasn't because I was jealous that
SWI-Prolog has dicts and dicts syntax,
its more the KISS principle, and the idea
that Prolog processors should pursue
non-functional optimizations without
new functional requirements. It might
appear as a strange idea, but it has many
advantages like not affecting the end-user
functionally in any way and not affecting
portability in any way. In as far my
tomb stones wish list is that long:
- SWI-Prolog dicts
- String type [not only SWI-Prolog]
The string type idea made it also into
a few newer Prolog system, but wouldn't it
be nice if strings where just transparent,
and implementation detail the Prolog processor
chooses, and not anything the end-user has
to worry about?
Mild Shock schrieb:

So we have two victims in 2024, two
things died in 2024, are pepsi now:
>
- Scryer Prolog
>
- SWI-Prolog Dicts
>
LoL

Date	Sujet	#	Auteur
30 Jul 24	DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore]	15	Mild Shock
30 Jul 24	Re: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore]	4	Mild Shock
30 Jul 24	Re: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore]	3	Mild Shock
31 Jul 24	Re: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore]	2	Mild Shock
31 Jul 24	Re: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore]	1	Mild Shock
10 Aug 24	post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1 (Was: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore])	7	Mild Shock
10 Aug 24	Re: post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1 (Was: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore])	6	Mild Shock
10 Aug 24	Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1)	5	Mild Shock
10 Aug 24	Re: Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1)	4	Mild Shock
10 Aug 24	Re: Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1)	3	Mild Shock
10 Aug 24	Re: Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1)	2	Mild Shock
11 Aug 24	Re: Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1)	1	Mild Shock
13 Aug 24	A PIP classification scheme is needed (Was: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore])	3	Mild Shock
13 Aug 24	Re: A PIP classification scheme is needed (Was: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore])	2	Mild Shock
13 Aug 24	Re: A PIP classification scheme is needed (Was: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore])	1	Mild Shock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal