Re: Why cant Scryer Prolog parse this? (Was: France is the Fire Nation of Prolog)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl prolog 
Sujet : Re: Why cant Scryer Prolog parse this? (Was: France is the Fire Nation of Prolog)
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : comp.lang.prolog
Date : 01. Sep 2024, 16:29:12
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <vb1tno$21359$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Ok, my bad, prefix (table) is probably
not the best example. This example works better:
scryer-prolog$ target/release/scryer-prolog
?- X = (#\/ = #\/).
    X = (#\/ = #\/).
?- use_module(library(clpz)).
    true.
?- X = (#\/ = #\/).
    error(syntax_error(incomplete_reduction),read_term/3:1).
versus:
trealla$ ./tpl
?- X = (#\/ = #\/).
    X = (#\/ = #\/) .
?- use_module(library(clpz)).
    true.
?- X = (#\/ = #\/).
    X = ((#\/)=(#\/)).
Mild Shock schrieb:
Tau Prolog can do it:
 https://github.com/tau-prolog/tau-prolog/issues/286
 But Tau Prolog is dead now, or hibernating for
more than 12 months already. So the more lenient
behaviour has already been ossified in this Prolog system.
 Another argument not in favor, it also makes parsing
more non-monotonic, if you introduce the "shall" condition,
because its a negative parsing condition.
```
$ target/release/scryer-prolog
?- X = (table = table).
    X = (table=table).
 ?- use_module(library(tabling)).
    true.
 ?- X = (table = table).
    error(syntax_error(incomplete_reduction),read_term/3:1).
```
Maybe introducing more than rather less operator table
dependencies in a grammar is always a mistake? A further
use case is (!)/1 in TPTP syntax.
 Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
>
Why cant Scryer Prolog parse this?
>
scryer-prolog$ target/release/scryer-prolog -v
v0.9.4-165-g12a61cdf
>
scryer-prolog$ target/release/scryer-prolog
>
?- current_op(X, Y, *).
    X = 400, Y = yfx.
>
?- X = (* = *).
    error(syntax_error(incomplete_reduction),read_term/3:1).
>
On the other hand Trealla Prolog has no problem:
>
trealla$ ./tpl -v
Trealla Prolog (c) Infradig 2020-2024, v2.55.31
>
trealla$ ./tpl
?- current_op(X, Y, *).
    X = 400, Y = yfx.
>
?- X = (* = *).
    X = ((*)=(*)).
>
What LEX / YACC did they use? Holy cow!
>
Bye
>
Mild Shock schrieb:
Is Canada also France? Seems I am not the only one who got
into struggle with Logtalk sooner or later. LoL
>
How its started:
Ticket raised by me Aug 9, 2021 (when I was "ghost")
Feature request flag dialect, maybe version and version_data
https://github.com/mthom/scryer-prolog/issues/1017
>
How its going:
Commit by pmoura last week
Delete Scryer Prolog support due to this system refusal to
support the de facto standard `version_data` flag
https://github.com/LogtalkDotOrg/logtalk3/commit/d93883c5a8b014af09bd0e11439eaff30e1c1a5c >
>
What happened?
>
LoL
>
>
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Sep 24 * Why cant Scryer Prolog parse this? (Was: France is the Fire Nation of Prolog)4Mild Shock
1 Sep 24 `* Re: Why cant Scryer Prolog parse this? (Was: France is the Fire Nation of Prolog)3Mild Shock
1 Sep 24  `* Re: Why cant Scryer Prolog parse this? (Was: France is the Fire Nation of Prolog)2Mild Shock
1 Sep 24   `- Re: Why cant Scryer Prolog parse this? (Was: France is the Fire Nation of Prolog)1Mild Shock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal