Oh shit, too late! (Re: "Emotional AI" and "Spiritual AI" (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise))

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl prolog 
Sujet : Oh shit, too late! (Re: "Emotional AI" and "Spiritual AI" (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise))
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : comp.lang.prolog
Date : 03. Oct 2024, 11:40:44
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <vdlsbb$12sv7$2@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Hi,
ChatGPT is currently showing new tricks to me
and would like to adapt its dialogue style:
"Got it! Emotionally connected communication can
indeed be concise and efficient, without losing depth.
I can focus more on direct responses that still acknowledge
emotional nuances, while avoiding unnecessary elaboration.
Would you like me to adapt this style right away?"
After I switched back to "elaboration", the thing gives
me information about "Spiritual AI":
"- Mindfulness and Meditation Apps: Apps like
Headspace and Calm use AI to guide meditation
and promote mindfulness, which are often
associated with spiritual growth.
- AI-driven Chatbots for Spiritual Guidance: For
example, in 2017, a chatbot named Jwitness was
designed to answer questions based on Jehovah's
Witness teachings.
- AI Prayer Companions: Some faith communities
are experimenting with AI that assists in
prayer or reflection
- Platforms that promote deeper philosophical
discussions, like Replika, which is designed to
engage in thoughtful and sometimes
existential conversations
- For instance, Woebot or Wysa help users navigate
emotions but also touch on existential themes
like purpose and fulfillment."
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
 ChatGPT is rather dry, giving me always some
choice lists displaying his knowledge. The
interaction is not very "involving".
 Could this be improved. There are possibly two
traits missing:
 Feelings:
- Emotional states
- Temporariness
- Reaction to external circumstances
- Changeability
- Subjective sensations
 Soul:
- Spirituality
- Immortality
- Innermost being
- Essence of an individual
- Deep, enduring aspects of human existence
 Mostlikely we will see both traits added to AI.
"Emotional AI" has been more discussed already,
"Spiritual AI" seems to be rather new.
 In a "Spiritual AI" Faith would probably be important,
which is probably at the upper end of credulous
reasoning. This means that such a ChatGPT could
 also babble that in a Prisoner Dilemma Game,
cooperation is always the better alternative,
e.g. promoting "altruistic" motives, etc.
 I also suspect that “Spiritual AI” and “Emotional
AI” could coexist.  Many religions give Cosmopolitan
magazin style life advice, and not just theological
 dogmas. There will probably soon be an “Inner Engineering”
app from Sadhguru that works with AI. Sadhguru is
also sometimes satirically referred to as Chadguru:
 Sat Guru Parody | Carryminati
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlZqxP5MXFs
 Mild Shock schrieb:
>
Could be a wake-up call this many participants
already in the commitee, that the whole logic
world was asleep for many years:
>
Non-Classical Logics. Theory and Applications XI,
5-8 September 2024, Lodz (Poland)
https://easychair.org/cfp/NCL24
>
Why is Minimal Logic at the core of many things?
Because it is the logic of Curry-Howard isomoprhism
for symple types:
>
----------------
Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ A
>
Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ B
----------------
Γ ⊢ A → B
>
Γ ⊢ A → B           Δ ⊢ A
----------------------------
Γ ∪ Δ ⊢ B
>
And funny things can happen, especially when people
hallucinate duality or think symmetry is given, for
example in newer inventions such as λμ-calculus,
>
but then omg ~~p => p is nevertheless not provable,
because they forgot an inference rule. LoL
>
Recommended reading so far:
>
Propositional Logics Related to Heyting’s and Johansson’s
February 2008 - Krister Segerberg
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228036664
>
The Logic of Church and Curry
Jonathan P. Seldin - 2009
https://www.sciencedirect.com/handbook/handbook-of-the-history-of-logic/vol/5/suppl/C >
>
Meanwhile I am going back to my tinkering with my
Prolog system, which even provides a more primitive
logic than minimal logic, pure Prolog is minimal
>
logic without embedded implication.
>
Mild Shock schrieb:
>
Your new Scrum Master is here! - ChatGPT, 2023
https://www.bbntimes.com/companies/ai-will-make-agile-coaches-and-scrum-masters-redundant-in-less-than-2-years >
>
LoL
>
Thomas Alva Edison schrieb am Dienstag, 10. Juli 2018 um 15:28:05 UTC+2:
Prolog Class Signpost - American Style 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxQKltWI0NA
>
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jul 24 * Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise (Was: The road to Artificial Intelligence)24Mild Shock
5 Jul 24 +* The curse of Negri & Plato (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)3Mild Shock
5 Jul 24 i`* Re: The curse of Negri & Plato (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)2Mild Shock
13 Jul 24 i `- Euklid: Am I a joke to you? (Re: The curse of Negri & Plato)1Mild Shock
5 Jul 24 +* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise (Was: The road to Artificial Intelligence)3Mild Shock
7 Jul 24 i`* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise (Was: The road to Artificial Intelligence)2Mild Shock
7 Jul 24 i `- Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise (Was: The road to Artificial Intelligence)1Mild Shock
12 Jul 24 +* French Philosophy in 2024 (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)4Mild Shock
12 Jul 24 i`* Re: French Philosophy in 2024 (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)3Mild Shock
12 Jul 24 i +- Corona isn't over 2024 (Was: French Philosophy in 2024)1Mild Shock
12 Jul 24 i `- Re: Corona isn't over 2024 (Was: French Philosophy in 2024)1Mild Shock
13 Jul 24 +* The error in Jan von Platos presentation (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)4Mild Shock
13 Jul 24 i`* Re: The error in Jan von Platos presentation (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)3Mild Shock
13 Jul 24 i `* Re: The error in Jan von Platos presentation (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)2Mild Shock
13 Jul 24 i  `- Re: The error in Jan von Platos presentation (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)1Mild Shock
22 Jul 24 +- Distinction between Computation & Derivation (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)1Mild Shock
31 Jul 24 +* Prolegomena by Rappaport (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise (Was: The road to Artificial Intelligence))5Mild Shock
3 Aug 24 i`* 2nd Cognitive Turn ~~> no Bayesian Brain (Re: Prolegomena by Rappaport)4Mild Shock
3 Aug 24 i `* Ok I made a joke, sorry (e: 2nd Cognitive Turn ~~> no Bayesian Brain)3Mild Shock
3 Aug 24 i  `* Re: Ok I made a joke, sorry (e: 2nd Cognitive Turn ~~> no Bayesian Brain)2Mild Shock
3 Aug 24 i   `- bullshit bullshit bullshit (Re: Ok I made a joke, sorry)1Mild Shock
3 Aug 24 +- The two rules (Was: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)1Mild Shock
3 Oct 24 `* "Emotional AI" and "Spiritual AI" (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise)2Mild Shock
3 Oct 24  `- Oh shit, too late! (Re: "Emotional AI" and "Spiritual AI" (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise))1Mild Shock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal