Sujet : Re: Affero General Public License (AGPL) (Was: There is GNU Prolog)
De : julio (at) *nospam* diegidio.name (Julio Di Egidio)
Groupes : comp.lang.prologDate : 24. Nov 2024, 01:06:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vhtqmm$1mdu7$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 24/11/2024 00:43, Mild Shock wrote:
What you don't find in GNU Prolog is library(misc/spin),
or open/3 that can work with http: or https: . I even
don't know whether GNU is still a good license for
GNU Prolog is full of bugs and it is a dead project by now: what's more, it is not the clean and mean base I would hope to fork from.
Dogelog looks much better in that and pretty much every technical sense: alas, it is not a viable licensing or even commercial scheme for me as it is (it's a matter of support to begin with).
Indeed, consider that, as far as I am concerned, choosing a Prolog engine is a commitment and an investment for the next 10 years minimum: I develop libraries and tools, not just occasional apps.
Julio
Should I use Dogelog?
Re: incompetence and stupidity among SO mods (Was: Fuck Around and Find Out (FAFO))