Whats the formula of ZIG (Was: Is it that worse with GNU Prolog?)

Hi,
Is ZIG based on GNU license. Does it matter?
Their GitHub looks extremly lively:
https://github.com/ziglang/zig
They use "The MIT License (Expat)". 957
contributors. Last commit 2 hours ago.
3k issues. Woa!
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:

Hi,
 Let me recap:
 You want a GNU license, still you can demonstrate
that GNU licensing system failed in the case of
GNU Prolog to create a vital community especially
 a community that works on the Prolog system itself?
But I am not 100% whether this is true, I saw
an interesting fork somewhere that supported Unicode.
 Maybe there will be suddently a new release? An
indicator that it is really dead could be their
GitHub issues and GitHub commits.
 https://github.com/didoudiaz/gprolog
 Last commit 12 months ago but a lot of new issues.
Thats really bad. Thats is "no support" right?
 Bye
 Julio Di Egidio schrieb:

On 24/11/2024 00:43, Mild Shock wrote:

What you don't find in GNU Prolog is library(misc/spin),
or open/3 that can work with http: or https: . I even
don't know whether GNU is still a good license for

>
GNU Prolog is full of bugs and it is a dead project by now: what's more, it is not the clean and mean base I would hope to fork from.
>
Dogelog looks much better in that and pretty much every technical sense: alas, it is not a viable licensing or even commercial scheme for me as it is (it's a matter of support to begin with).
>
Indeed, consider that, as far as I am concerned, choosing a Prolog engine is a commitment and an investment for the next 10 years minimum: I develop libraries and tools, not just occasional apps.
>
Julio
>