Re: Python recompile

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl python 
Sujet : Re: Python recompile
De : 643-408-1753 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Groupes : comp.lang.c comp.lang.c++ comp.lang.python
Date : 04. Mar 2025, 18:42:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20250304092827.708@kylheku.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
On 2025-03-04, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org <Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:57:16 +0000
Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wibbled:
On 04/03/2025 09:23, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
because plenty of compilation issues are caused by code issues.
>
Undoubtedly true, and equally undoubtedly irrelevant in this
case. Were it relevant, the OP would by now have shown us the
problem code.
>
So what you're saying is you can't troubleshoot linking problems. Do you
get someone else to compile your code for you?

Python is not "your code" for any value of "your" referring to any
regular here in comp.lang.c.

A compiler is a compiler, a linker is a linker. Troubleshooting both is part
of the development process of any competent C dev. But we know already you
don't consider that to be the case because its beyond your abilities.

Troubleshooting an open source package build problem is often a complex
problem that in most cases requires direct access to the environment
where the problem is happening.

It's actually a case of porting. When Python does not build in some OS
distro with certain compilers, that's a kind of porting challenge.

The program in question almost certainly doesn't have a C language
problem. It has a build system portability problem.  Even though
some build system portability problems intersect with C topics, This
isn't a build system portability problem newsgroup.

"Port this big package for me to my environment because I don't know
what I'm doing" is not a suitable discussion topic here for reasons like
people not having that exact environment ot be able to reproduce the
problem, and people not coming here to discuss that sort of thing.

It's a lot better to take it to either a mailing list for the platform
where you are trying to port the program, or else the mailing list for
that program.

The build issue could be something that recurs for other programs
being ported to the same environment.

--
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Mar 25 * Re: Python recompile60Lew Pitcher
2 Mar 25 +* Re: Python recompile58Muttley
2 Mar 25 i+* Re: Python recompile2Lew Pitcher
3 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
2 Mar 25 i`* Re: Python recompile55James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i `* Re: Python recompile54Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Python recompile5Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: Python recompile4Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  i +* Re: Python recompile2bart
3 Mar 25 i  i i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  i `- Re: Python recompile1Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Python recompile48James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i   +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Python recompile46geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile26James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i    i+* Re: Python recompile23Muttley
3 Mar 25 i    ii+* Re: Python recompile3David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    iii`* Re: Python recompile2Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii `- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
3 Mar 25 i    ii+* Re: Python recompile18Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii`* Re: Python recompile17Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii `* Re: Python recompile16Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  +* Re: Python recompile14Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i`* Re: Python recompile13Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i `* Re: Python recompile12Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  `* Re: Python recompile9Kaz Kylheku
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i   `* Re: Python recompile8bart
5 Mar 25 i    iii  i    +* Re: Python recompile6Muttley
6 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i`* Re: Python recompile5Waldek Hebisch
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i `* Re: Python recompile3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i  +- Re: Python recompile1bart
10 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i  `- Re: Python recompile1Waldek Hebisch
6 Mar 25 i    iii  i    `- Re: Python recompile1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Mar 25 i    iii  `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
4 Mar 25 i    ii`- Re: Python recompile1Kenny McCormack
3 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile2geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    i `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile10Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile9geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    i +* Re: Python recompile4Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i i`* Re: Python recompile3geodandw
4 Mar 25 i    i i +- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
4 Mar 25 i    i i `- Re: Python recompile1Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i `* Re: Python recompile4David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    i  +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i  i`- Re: Python recompile1Muffley
4 Mar 25 i    i  `- Re: Python recompile1Michael S
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile3David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile2Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    i `- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
6 Mar 25 i    `* Re: Python recompile5Stuart Redmann
6 Mar 25 i     +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
6 Mar 25 i     i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
6 Mar 25 i     +- Re: Python recompile1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Mar 25 i     `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
2 Mar 25 `- Re: Python recompile1Left Right

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal