Re: Python recompile

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl python 
Sujet : Re: Python recompile
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.lang.c comp.lang.c++ comp.lang.python
Date : 04. Mar 2025, 11:25:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vq6kdt$1pmnk$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 04/03/2025 10:03, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:57:16 +0000
Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wibbled:
On 04/03/2025 09:23, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
because plenty of compilation issues are caused by code issues.
>
Undoubtedly true, and equally undoubtedly irrelevant in this
case. Were it relevant, the OP would by now have shown us the
problem code.
 So what you're saying is you can't troubleshoot linking problems.
No, that's not what I'm saying. Do learn to read. What I'm saying is that the OP would be better served by posting the problem statement in a group more closely related to the actual problem.
We may, I trust, presume that the Python source he is building is production code that has successfully been built before by other people? If so, then it's not a language issue, and that is enough to put it beyond comp.lang.c's brief.

Do you
get someone else to compile your code for you?
I tell the compiler to do it. Don't you?

 
Or are you claiming those don't count as part of development?
>
Not at all. Your keyboard's shift key is part of development too,
but that isn't enough to make it topical in comp.lang.c.
 Oh dear, if stuck go in circles, posted comparisons conveniently ignored.
Your inability to comprehend analogies does not stop them from being valid illustrations of the gaping holes in your "argument" (such as it is).

 
K&R would also claim that the function parameter type definitions have to
follow the prototype. Luckily that hasn't been the case since 1989.
>
Is it, then, your claim that K&R are mistaken or outdated and
 Is K&R outdated? Hmm, let me think about that for a nanosecond...
So it *is* your claim that...

that compilation no longer depends on the system you are using
and has now become a language attribute? Can you hear the
chuckles yet?
Laughing my socks off. Time to plonk, perhaps?

Wtf has the language standard got to do with anything?
Yep; time to plonk.
Bye-bye.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Mar 25 * Re: Python recompile60Lew Pitcher
2 Mar 25 +* Re: Python recompile58Muttley
2 Mar 25 i+* Re: Python recompile2Lew Pitcher
3 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
2 Mar 25 i`* Re: Python recompile55James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i `* Re: Python recompile54Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Python recompile5Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: Python recompile4Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  i +* Re: Python recompile2bart
3 Mar 25 i  i i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  i `- Re: Python recompile1Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Python recompile48James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i   +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Python recompile46geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile26James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i    i+* Re: Python recompile23Muttley
3 Mar 25 i    ii+* Re: Python recompile3David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    iii`* Re: Python recompile2Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii `- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
3 Mar 25 i    ii+* Re: Python recompile18Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii`* Re: Python recompile17Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii `* Re: Python recompile16Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  +* Re: Python recompile14Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i`* Re: Python recompile13Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i `* Re: Python recompile12Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  `* Re: Python recompile9Kaz Kylheku
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i   `* Re: Python recompile8bart
5 Mar 25 i    iii  i    +* Re: Python recompile6Muttley
6 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i`* Re: Python recompile5Waldek Hebisch
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i `* Re: Python recompile3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i  +- Re: Python recompile1bart
10 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i  `- Re: Python recompile1Waldek Hebisch
6 Mar 25 i    iii  i    `- Re: Python recompile1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Mar 25 i    iii  `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
4 Mar 25 i    ii`- Re: Python recompile1Kenny McCormack
3 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile2geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    i `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile10Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile9geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    i +* Re: Python recompile4Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i i`* Re: Python recompile3geodandw
4 Mar 25 i    i i +- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
4 Mar 25 i    i i `- Re: Python recompile1Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i `* Re: Python recompile4David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    i  +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i  i`- Re: Python recompile1Muffley
4 Mar 25 i    i  `- Re: Python recompile1Michael S
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile3David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile2Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    i `- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
6 Mar 25 i    `* Re: Python recompile5Stuart Redmann
6 Mar 25 i     +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
6 Mar 25 i     i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
6 Mar 25 i     +- Re: Python recompile1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Mar 25 i     `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
2 Mar 25 `- Re: Python recompile1Left Right

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal