Sujet : Re: Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp
De : 2QdxY4RzWzUUiLuE (at) *nospam* potatochowder.com
Groupes : comp.lang.pythonDate : 27. May 2024, 22:59:51
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <mailman.48.1716844903.2909.python-list@python.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
On 2024-05-27 at 12:37:01 -0700,
HenHanna via Python-list <
python-list@python.org> wrote:
On 5/27/2024 7:18 AM, Cor wrote:
Some entity, AKA "B. Pym" <No_spamming@noWhere_7073.org>,
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
On 12/16/2023, cor@clsnet.nl wrote:
Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill
defined barely usable re-implementation of half of common-lisp
The good news is, it's not Lisp that sucks, but Common Lisp.
--- Paul Graham
Just to set the record straight;
This is not My line.
I quoted it but don't know who the originator of that remark is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenspun%27s_tenth_rule
Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp
Re: Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp