Sujet : Re: Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp
De : HenHanna (at) *nospam* devnull.tb (HenHanna)
Groupes : comp.lang.python comp.lang.lispDate : 29. May 2024, 20:39:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v37sok$18m00$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/27/2024 1:59 PM,
2QdxY4RzWzUUiLuE@potatochowder.com wrote:
On 2024-05-27 at 12:37:01 -0700,
HenHanna via Python-list <python-list@python.org> wrote:
>
On 5/27/2024 7:18 AM, Cor wrote:
Some entity, AKA "B. Pym" <No_spamming@noWhere_7073.org>,
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
>
On 12/16/2023, cor@clsnet.nl wrote:
>
Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill
defined barely usable re-implementation of half of common-lisp
>
The good news is, it's not Lisp that sucks, but Common Lisp.
--- Paul Graham
>
Just to set the record straight;
This is not My line.
I quoted it but don't know who the originator of that remark is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenspun%27s_tenth_rule
interesting!!!
Are the Rules 1--9 by Greenspun good too?
does Greenspun pun ?
Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp
Re: Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp