Re: new here

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl python 
Sujet : Re: new here
De : PythonList (at) *nospam* DancesWithMice.info (dn)
Groupes : comp.lang.python
Date : 23. Aug 2024, 06:23:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : DWM
Message-ID : <mailman.66.1724387030.2890.python-list@python.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 23/08/24 15:43, rbowman via Python-list wrote:
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:36:02 +1200, dn wrote:
On 23/08/24 07:49, rbowman via Python-list wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:40:52 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
>
The Pico uses MicroPython which is stuck on an old version of Python,
unfortunately.
>
How did this enter the conversation/thread?
>
Paul's 'contribution' does not even appear on the Archive...
 I'm probably guilty. I mentioned in passing the older protocols like
finger could even be implemented on something like the Pico W with
MicroPython.
The question arose because his message doesn't appear either in the conversation/email thread 'here', nor on the Archive. Perhaps not sent to the list?

I am confused by the cross-over to Python-list. I only read/post to
comp.lang.python. Is that echoed to Python-list or vice versa?
As I understand it, posts to 'the list' may be made at comp.lang.python or by email. Once on the server, messages are reflected back to both. Thus, Thunderbird is not set-up to use the newsgroup and keeps complaining at me when it's asked to reply to both. So, all contributions (from me) enter the server via email.

I haven't worked with CircuitPython lately and don't know if it has
pulled in later features.
>
Have you (gentle reader) used both and feel able to offer a comparison -
when to prefer one over the other?
 I've only used CircuitPython on the Adafruit Playground Express.
https://circuitpython.org/board/circuitplayground_express/
and MicroPython on the Pico W. Since then Adafruit has expanded their
collection of boards and support them with CircuitPython.
 One difference that makes them hard to compare is the Express has quite a
few on-board sensors like the Arduino Nano Sense 33, and interfaces to
them are baked into CircuitPython.
 The Pico W has a wealth of I/O most doubling as I2C, PWM, or A/D with only
a onboard LED for the mandatory 'hello world' blink code. MicroPython is
more generic and you may have to import modules for specific external
devices like the SSD1306 OLED display. That's easily done with Thonny or
pipkin.
Adding a display to the Pico-W is my next project... After that, gyros (am thinking it may not go so well, on balance... hah!).
The Pico-W impresses. Its built-in Wi-Fi/Bluetooth capability makes life a lot easier (inside building use).
Apart from the earlier comment, my biggest frustration has come from the lack of facilities in Thonny compared with PyCharm - but will pick-up skills there, no doubt.
Conversely, (to having a separate radio-chip) I think I prefer the idea of being able to connect the Pico to whichever sensor(s) is/are actually-required. However, this is applied use - not learning or 'playing'.

As far as core Python I'd say they're similar. MicroPython is more generic
and may require more work to set up where Adafruit can match the boards
they have developed.
 As I said it's been a while but MicroPython has the _threading module so
you can utilize both cores of the RP2040. Adafruit's new Feather has a
RP2040 and like the Pico W assumes you'll be using the PIO to externals
rather than anything onboard so CircuitPython probably has it.
 https://www.adafruit.com/product/4884
  From the horse's mouth:
 "There is great C/C++ support, unofficial (but really good) Arduino
support, an official MicroPython port, and a CircuitPython port! We of
course recommend CircuitPython because we think it's the easiest way to
get started and it has support with most of our drivers, displays,
sensors, and more, supported out of the box so you can follow along with
our CircuitPython projects and tutorials."
Whilst agreeing with the "easiest way to get started" claim, it probably also leads to the assumption that it will (later) be easier to run out of capability. Hence, that MicroPython would be the better professional option - assuming one already knows Python.
Yes, a degree of 'comparing apples with oranges' - and a continually-moving target!

I don't know if Adafruit has a RP2350 board yet but they say CircuitPython
will be even happier on the Pico 2.
https://www.adafruit.com/product/6006
No, out in the real-world, the Pico 2 is still vaporware.

For better or worse there are a lot more choices now than fiddling around
with the Arduino Uno back in the day.
True.
Hence the question.
Thanks for the comments!
--
Regards,
=dn

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Aug 24 * Re: new here22rbowman
22 Aug 24 +* Re: new here2dn
22 Aug 24 i`- Re: new here1rbowman
22 Aug 24 +- Re: new here1Jason Friedman
22 Aug 24 +* Re: new here2rbowman
22 Aug 24 i`- Re: new here1rbowman
22 Aug 24 `* Re: new here16Paul Rubin
22 Aug 24  `* Re: new here15rbowman
22 Aug 24   `* Re: new here14dn
23 Aug 24    +* Re: new here3Paul Rubin
23 Aug 24    i`* Re: new here2rbowman
26 Aug 24    i `- Re: new here1dn
23 Aug 24    `* Re: new here10rbowman
23 Aug 24     +* Re: new here (Posting On Python-List Prohibited)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Aug 24     i`- Re: new here1Keith Thompson
23 Aug 24     `* Re: new here7dn
23 Aug 24      `* Re: new here6rbowman
26 Aug 24       +* Re: new here3<avi.e.gross
26 Aug 24       i`* Re: new here2rbowman
28 Aug 24       i `- Re: new here1rbowman
26 Aug 24       +- Re: new here1MRAB
26 Aug 24       `- Re: new here1<avi.e.gross

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal