Sujet : Re: Beazley's Problem
De : annada (at) *nospam* tilde.green (Annada Behera)
Groupes : comp.lang.pythonDate : 23. Sep 2024, 09:44:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : tilde.green
Message-ID : <0709b4b8b0bbf2a32d53649d1a6fbefbcd44a68a.camel@tilde.green>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Evolution 3.52.2
The "next-level math trick" Newton-Raphson has nothing to do with
functional programming. I have written solvers in purely iterative
style. As far as I know, Newton-Raphson is the opposite of functional
programming as you iteratively solve for the root. Functional programming
is stateless where you are not allowed to store any state (current best
guess root).
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Rubin <
no.email@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Beazley's Problem
Date: 09/22/2024 01:49:50 AM
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
It's hella rad to see you bust out those "next-level math tricks"
with just a single line each!
You might like:
https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/dat/miranda/whyfp90.pdfThe numerics stuff starts on page 9.
Beazley's Problem
Re: Beazley's Problem (Posting On Python-List Prohibited)