Re: Python recompile

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl python 
Sujet : Re: Python recompile
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.lang.c comp.lang.c++ comp.lang.python
Date : 03. Mar 2025, 13:47:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vq48cq$1aeoc$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 03/03/2025 10:44, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 08:31:16 +0000
Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wibbled:
On 03/03/2025 08:13, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 12:30:53 -0500
James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wibbled:
On Sun, 02 Mar 2025 16:58:20 +0000, Muttley wrote:
comp.lang.c is about using the C programming language. Linkers are
independent of the programming language, and can be used to link
>
Without compilers and linkers a C program would just be a load of text.
>
And without people to write it and buildings in which to work it
wouldn't even be that, so by your argument everything from
demographics to urban planning would be topical here.
>
It's an old argument, but it has never been a good one.
 Really?
Really.

So if a compiler gives an error thats not a C problem?
The compiler isn't a C problem. The code that prompted the error can be.

Go ask a
group for the specific compiler?
If the question is about the compiler, yes.
If the question is about C code, they will properly redirect you here.

 What a load of narrow minded BS.
Why don't you cut to the chase and say something bad about my mother? The fact that you don't understand topicality does not invalidate the concept of topicality.

Its not as if these groups get hundreds of
messages a day and the amount needs to be cut down.
The groups where the question is topical do not get hundreds of messages a day either. Why steal their questions?

 
If you'd taken 2 seconds to look at it you'd realise the issue was building
the Python source code which is written in C. That sounds like a C issue to
me.
>
Then you have very gullible ears. Building the Python source is
 No idea what gullible ears is supposed to mean.
I'm sorry. I'll dial back the rhetoric for you.
Building Python source not C question. Capisce?

an issue for a specific compiler group.
 So which group would that be then?
No idea. But we're crossposted to comp.lang.python, who may be willing to give you a hint.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Mar 25 * Re: Python recompile60Lew Pitcher
2 Mar 25 +* Re: Python recompile58Muttley
2 Mar 25 i+* Re: Python recompile2Lew Pitcher
3 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
2 Mar 25 i`* Re: Python recompile55James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i `* Re: Python recompile54Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Python recompile5Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: Python recompile4Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  i +* Re: Python recompile2bart
3 Mar 25 i  i i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  i `- Re: Python recompile1Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Python recompile48James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i   +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Python recompile46geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile26James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i    i+* Re: Python recompile23Muttley
3 Mar 25 i    ii+* Re: Python recompile3David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    iii`* Re: Python recompile2Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii `- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
3 Mar 25 i    ii+* Re: Python recompile18Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii`* Re: Python recompile17Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii `* Re: Python recompile16Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  +* Re: Python recompile14Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i`* Re: Python recompile13Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i `* Re: Python recompile12Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  `* Re: Python recompile9Kaz Kylheku
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i   `* Re: Python recompile8bart
5 Mar 25 i    iii  i    +* Re: Python recompile6Muttley
6 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i`* Re: Python recompile5Waldek Hebisch
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i `* Re: Python recompile3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i  +- Re: Python recompile1bart
10 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i  `- Re: Python recompile1Waldek Hebisch
6 Mar 25 i    iii  i    `- Re: Python recompile1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Mar 25 i    iii  `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
4 Mar 25 i    ii`- Re: Python recompile1Kenny McCormack
3 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile2geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    i `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile10Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile9geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    i +* Re: Python recompile4Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i i`* Re: Python recompile3geodandw
4 Mar 25 i    i i +- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
4 Mar 25 i    i i `- Re: Python recompile1Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i `* Re: Python recompile4David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    i  +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i  i`- Re: Python recompile1Muffley
4 Mar 25 i    i  `- Re: Python recompile1Michael S
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile3David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile2Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    i `- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
6 Mar 25 i    `* Re: Python recompile5Stuart Redmann
6 Mar 25 i     +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
6 Mar 25 i     i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
6 Mar 25 i     +- Re: Python recompile1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Mar 25 i     `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
2 Mar 25 `- Re: Python recompile1Left Right

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal