Re: Python recompile

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl python 
Sujet : Re: Python recompile
De : geodandw (at) *nospam* gmail.com (geodandw)
Groupes : comp.lang.c comp.lang.c++ comp.lang.python
Date : 03. Mar 2025, 17:24:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vq4l3d$1ck9e$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/3/25 10:22, James Kuyper wrote:
On 03/03/2025 08:13, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 12:30:53 -0500
James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wibbled:
On Sun, 02 Mar 2025 16:58:20 +0000, Muttley wrote:
>
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 15:54:19 -0000 (UTC)
Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> gabbled:
First off, this isn't really on-topic for comp.lang.c, as it is a question
regarding a linker, interacting
with the results of various options given to a specific compiler.
>
Is there a comp.lang.c.linker group?
>
comp.lang.c is about using the C programming language. Linkers are
independent of the programming language, and can be used to link
>
Without compilers and linkers a C program would just be a load of text.
 Without computers, keyboards and monitors most C programs wouldn't be
much use, either. That doesn't make a malfunctioning computer monitor a
C problem. And it doesn't make a linkage problems a C problem either.
 
together programs written in many different languages. The subject line
and the text of the error messages indicate that it's a Python program,
so why would a group devoted to C be in any way appropriate?
>
If you'd taken 2 seconds to look at it you'd realise the issue was building
the Python source code which is written in C.
 The indentations of the first message cross-posted to comp.lang.c and
comp.lang.c++ suggest that it was the latest in a series of earlier
messages posted somewhere else (comp.lang.python?). Those earlier
messages might have contained additional information. If that
information was relevant, it should have been included when the message
was first cross-posted to comp.lang.c or comp.lang.c++. You might be
right about it being "Python source code ... written in C", but nothing
in the messages that were posted here makes that obvious.
   That sounds like a C issue to me.
 If it were a C problem, then the C source code that produced the problem
should have been shown. It's hard to debug code that you can't see.
Why is this group so intolerant?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Mar 25 * Re: Python recompile60Lew Pitcher
2 Mar 25 +* Re: Python recompile58Muttley
2 Mar 25 i+* Re: Python recompile2Lew Pitcher
3 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
2 Mar 25 i`* Re: Python recompile55James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i `* Re: Python recompile54Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Python recompile5Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: Python recompile4Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  i +* Re: Python recompile2bart
3 Mar 25 i  i i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i  i `- Re: Python recompile1Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Python recompile48James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i   +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Python recompile46geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile26James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i    i+* Re: Python recompile23Muttley
3 Mar 25 i    ii+* Re: Python recompile3David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    iii`* Re: Python recompile2Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii `- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
3 Mar 25 i    ii+* Re: Python recompile18Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii`* Re: Python recompile17Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii `* Re: Python recompile16Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  +* Re: Python recompile14Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i`* Re: Python recompile13Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i `* Re: Python recompile12Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i  `* Re: Python recompile9Kaz Kylheku
4 Mar 25 i    iii  i   `* Re: Python recompile8bart
5 Mar 25 i    iii  i    +* Re: Python recompile6Muttley
6 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i`* Re: Python recompile5Waldek Hebisch
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i +- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i `* Re: Python recompile3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i  +- Re: Python recompile1bart
10 Mar 25 i    iii  i    i  `- Re: Python recompile1Waldek Hebisch
6 Mar 25 i    iii  i    `- Re: Python recompile1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Mar 25 i    iii  `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
4 Mar 25 i    ii`- Re: Python recompile1Kenny McCormack
3 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile2geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    i `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile10Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile9geodandw
3 Mar 25 i    i +* Re: Python recompile4Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i i`* Re: Python recompile3geodandw
4 Mar 25 i    i i +- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
4 Mar 25 i    i i `- Re: Python recompile1Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i `* Re: Python recompile4David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    i  +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i    i  i`- Re: Python recompile1Muffley
4 Mar 25 i    i  `- Re: Python recompile1Michael S
3 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Python recompile3David Brown
4 Mar 25 i    i`* Re: Python recompile2Muttley
4 Mar 25 i    i `- Re: Python recompile1Kaz Kylheku
6 Mar 25 i    `* Re: Python recompile5Stuart Redmann
6 Mar 25 i     +* Re: Python recompile2Richard Heathfield
6 Mar 25 i     i`- Re: Python recompile1Muttley
6 Mar 25 i     +- Re: Python recompile1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Mar 25 i     `- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
2 Mar 25 `- Re: Python recompile1Left Right

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal