Sujet : Re: Context without manager
De : ram (at) *nospam* zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Groupes : comp.lang.pythonDate : 26. Nov 2023, 20:15:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Stefan Ram
Message-ID : <contraction-20231126201357@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
References : 1 2 3 4
Piergiorgio Sartor <
piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> writes:
The problem is I've some SDK of some device which
provides context manager *only* classes.
Everybody please excuse my being off topic. But it really
make is hard for me to read messages when contractions are
used in a way that seems wrong to me. I noticed this now for
the third time in a post by Piergiorgio.
I (not being a native speaker myself) think, when "have" is
the main verb, it is not contracted. It's contracted when
it's an auxiliary verb. So:
I've seen this before.
I've got another an.
, but (note that no other verb follows "have" directly):
I have been there.
I have all of them.
I wrote all of the above just by my own judgement, but now let
me try to find something in the Web so support this: Web:
|As far as I'm aware, verbs are usually only contracted when they are:
|auxiliary, e.g. 'are' in they're leaving, and
|unstressed (they can be attached to a stressed word but remain
| unstressed, themselves), and
|informal/casual (or formal when quoted verbatim).
...
|in en-US, where they favour using 'have' as a main verb, which
|does not get contracted:
|"I have money"
...
quoted from the World-Wide Web.
The other two cases were:
I've myself unclear ideas
and
I'll not see any reply
.