Sujet : Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp
De : HenHanna (at) *nospam* devnull.tb (HenHanna)
Groupes : comp.lang.lisp comp.lang.scheme comp.lang.pythonDate : 27. May 2024, 21:37:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v32ncu$68vb$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/27/2024 7:18 AM, Cor wrote:
Some entity, AKA "B. Pym" <No_spamming@noWhere_7073.org>,
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
On 12/16/2023, cor@clsnet.nl wrote:
>
Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill
defined barely usable re-implementation of half of common-lisp
>
The good news is, it's not Lisp that sucks, but Common Lisp.
--- Paul Graham
Just to set the record straight;
This is not My line.
I quoted it but don't know who the originator of that remark is.
Cor
a few years ago... when i started learning Python...
it was so exciting...
Every day i thought...
--- THis is Lisp in a thin-disguise ... SO Everyone gets it now.
Everyone is a Lisper now.
Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp
Re: Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp