Sujet : Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
De : Nobody447095 (at) *nospam* here-nor-there.org (B. Pym)
Groupes : comp.lang.lisp comp.lang.schemeDate : 24. Jul 2025, 10:20:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <105sttp$l368$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : XanaNews/1.18.1.6
Contrast the much more common
a[i] = b[n]
with
(setf (aref a i) (aref b n))
Would this be concise enough?
(a i b n)
Gauche Scheme
(define-method object-apply
((v0 <vector>) (i0 <integer>) (v1 <vector>) (i1 <integer>))
(vector-set! v0 i0 (ref v1 i1)))
(define a #(2 4 6 8))
(define b #(30 50 70 90))
gosh> a
#(2 4 6 8)
(a 2 b 3)
gosh> a
#(2 4 90 8)
-- [T]he problem is that lispniks are as cultish as any other devout group andbasically fall down frothing at the mouth if they see [heterodoxy]. --- Kenny TiltonThe good news is, it's not Lisp that sucks, but Common Lisp. --- Paul Graham
| Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
| 24 Jul 25 | Re: merits of Lisp vs Python | 1 | | B. Pym |
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.
NewsPortal