Sujet : Re: Why do we need "eval"? (Expect question)
De : gazelle (at) *nospam* shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Groupes : comp.lang.tclDate : 13. Sep 2024, 18:17:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID : <vc1s3q$1uhk4$1@news.xmission.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
vc0lm1$npv9$1@dont-email.me>,
Harald Oehlmann <
wortkarg3@yahoo.com> wrote:
Am 12.09.2024 um 20:45 schrieb Kenny McCormack:
ISTM that this {*} thing is a relatively recent addition to the langauge,
since Expect has been around for a long time, and most of the scripts that
do this sort of thing were written long ago.
>
"Relatively recent" is quite relative. Here is the relevant changes file
entry:
>
2006-11-02 (feature change)[TIP 293] Replace {expand} with {*} (hobbs)
*** POTENTIAL INCOMPATIBILITY with previous 8.5 alphas only ***
>
;-)
The other poster seemed to think 2016 (not 2006). That's still 8 years
ago...
-- Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz claims that only ugly women wantabortions, which they will never need since no one will impregnate them.
Why do we need "eval"? (Expect question)
Re: Why do we need "eval"? (Expect question)