Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl tcl 
Sujet : Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?
De : (at) *nospam* ednolan (ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan)
Groupes : comp.lang.tcl
Date : 29. Jun 2024, 06:19:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : loft
Message-ID : <le9jquFeig3U1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
In article <slrnv7ud1t.3gvbf.avl@logic.at>,
Andreas Leitgeb  <avl@logic.at> wrote:
Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> wrote:
I'd like it to open a .png file (screenshot from an android
phone) extract five rectangular regions from it, and convert
them to something similar to Tk's [$image data] - e.g. a list
of lists of colors
>
Thanks to all who answered...
>
Unfortunately, I haven't yet succeeded with any of the suggestions.
>
That's where I got stuck with each:
>
Gerald Lester:
http://www.graphicsmagick.org/TclMagick/doc/TclMagick.html
Ted Nolan:
https://wiki.tcl-lang.org/page/TclMagick
>
I got it to configure it
 
(--with-magick=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ImageMagick-6.9.11/bin-q16/MagickWand-config)
compile and install "apparently" successfully, but "package require TclMagick"
spews out:
 couldn't load file "/usr/local/lib/TclMagick0.45/libTclMagick.so":
 /usr/local/lib/TclMagick0.45/libTclMagick.so: undefined symbol:
 tclStubsPtr
>

I'm not pushing the package, as all I know about it is that it exists,
but that sounds like maybe you should link against the stubs library,
libtclstub86.a (on my FreeBSD) rather than libtcl86.so/libtcl86.a
--
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Jun 24 * is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?17Andreas Leitgeb
27 Jun 24 +- Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
27 Jun 24 +- Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?1Harald Oehlmann
27 Jun 24 +- Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?1Paul Obermeier
27 Jun 24 +* Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?3greg
28 Jun 24 i+- Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?1Harald Oehlmann
28 Jun 24 i`- Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?1greg
28 Jun 24 `* Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?10Andreas Leitgeb
29 Jun 24  +- Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
29 Jun 24  +* Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?7greg
30 Jun 24  i`* Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?6Andreas Leitgeb
30 Jun 24  i +* Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?4greg
1 Jul 24  i i`* Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?3Andreas Leitgeb
2 Jul 24  i i `* Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?2greg
3 Jul 24  i i  `- Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?1Andreas Leitgeb
1 Jul 24  i `- Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?1Christian Gollwitzer
30 Jun 24  `- Re: is there an image package that doesn't require Tk ?1Andreas Leitgeb

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal