Re: Nice example about the "inefficiently" of the tcl "c" api.

Am 08.09.24 um 15:26 schrieb Gerald Lester:

On 9/8/24 08:04, undroidwish wrote:

On 9/6/24 22:36, aotto1968 wrote:
>

Down is the "C" code of the C-Function to test the an "object" to be valid.
...

>
Hmm, to judge the "efficiently" of the tcl "c" api is between difficult
and impossible due to your "cryptically" "c" code snippets. In other
words, more context would be of tremendous help. So where is the beef?
Or ham, or even spam?

 Others, including myself, have asked him for the Tcl and Python code he is using to get his measurements -- he has consistently refused to supply the code.
 Long and short, to me this is just spam.

Also my conclusion. As far as I understand it, he has written his own warpper generator - something like SWIG - and calls ist "universal compiler" or similar names. His Tcl wrappers are much slower than his Python wrappers. It seems that he creates TclOO objects in his code. I would suggest to simply use SWIG and then talk about the performance. My guess is that SWIG wrappers will not show any difference between Tcl and Python (because they are not based on TclOO in Tcl, which is not necessary to get an OO interface).
           Christian