Sujet : Re: lsearch proposed option
De : emiliano (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Emiliano)
Groupes : comp.lang.tclDate : 03. Jan 2025, 00:28:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20250102202854.b9d16596b2f78f5f4cff2823@example.invalid>
References : 1
User-Agent : Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 21:39:32 -0000 (UTC)
Rich <
rich@example.invalid> wrote:
aotto1968 <aotto1968@t-online.de> wrote:
It is preferable to start a new thread for a new topic.
other stuff
# OLD
proc ::myoo::ClassIs {myR cls} {
upvar $myR my
expr {[llength [lsearch -exact -sorted [set $my(__CLASS__)::__SUPER__SORTED__] $cls]] > 0}
}
# want to have
proc ::myoo::ClassIs {myR cls} {
upvar $myR my
lsearch -exists -exact -sorted [set $my(__CLASS__)::__SUPER__SORTED__] $cls
}
ONE simple FLAG erase a lot of code.
Write up a TIP, and supply an implementation, and the maintainers just
might add your feature.
Or simply use
proc ::myoo::ClassIs {myR cls} {
upvar $myR my
expr {$cls in [set $my(__CLASS__)::__SUPER__SORTED__]}
}
-- Emiliano