Sujet : Re: misunderstaning of switch command
De : wortkarg3 (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Harald Oehlmann)
Groupes : comp.lang.tclDate : 24. Jun 2025, 09:58:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103dpb8$1s2ei$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 24.06.2025 um 10:46 schrieb Mark Summerfield:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:37:08 +0200, Harald Oehlmann wrote:
Am 24.06.2025 um 10:23 schrieb Mark Summerfield:
I have a switch command which is doing something I don't expect but I
don't understand what I've done wrong. In this example the default is
always executed but I expect the case before that to be executed.
>
const UNCOMPRESSED U const ZLIB_COMPRESSED Z const SAME_AS_PREV =
set filename somefile.txt set action "added"
set kind Z switch $kind {
$::SAME_AS_PREV { puts "unchanged \"$filename\"" }
$::UNCOMPRESSED { puts "$action \"$filename\"" }
$::ZLIB_COMPRESSED { puts "$action \"$filename\" (zlib
compressed)" }
default { puts "!!!!!!!! UNEXPECTED !!!!!!!!" }
}
>
What am I doing wrong?
>
Nothing wrong. Tcl is just different, sorry for that.
>
The "{" always avoids expansion of variables and commands. If you want
to use variables in the switch, you have to avoid the "{".
>
switch -exact -- $kind [list\
$::SAME_AS_PREV { puts "unchanged \"$filename\"" }\
$::UNCOMPRESSED { puts "$action \"$filename\"" }
$::ZLIB_COMPRESSED { puts "$action \"$filename\" (zlib
compressed)" }\
default { puts "!!!!!!!! UNEXPECTED !!!!!!!!" }\
]
>
Nevertheless, this is no fun on the quoting level (backslashes at the
end etc). In addition, you have to take care, when the variable
expansion happens. This might be tricky.
>
I personally would write it like that:
>
switch -exact -- $kind {
= { # SAME_AS_PREV
puts "unchanged \"$filename\""
}
U { # UNCOMPRESSED
puts "$action \"$filename\""
}
Z { # ZLIB_COMPRESSED
puts "$action \"$filename\" (zlib compressed)"
}
default { puts "!!!!!!!! UNEXPECTED !!!!!!!!" }
}
>
Harald
Thanks that works great.
Bit of a disinsentive to use consts though!
Great, that it works for you.
If I want to compare something with multiple variables, I would use an if chain:
if {$kind eq $::SAME_AS_PREV} {
puts "unchanged \"$filename\""
} else if {$kind eq $::UNCOMPRESSED} {
puts "$action \"$filename\""
} else if {$kind eq $::ZLIB_COMPRESSED} {
puts "$action \"$filename\" (zlib >> compressed)"
} else {
puts "!!!!!!!! UNEXPECTED !!!!!!!!"
}
The "if" command takes his first argument and passes it to "expr".
Then, eval will do the variable expansion.
This does not happen with "switch".
I never used const. But its use may help for clarity.
Harald