Sujet : Re: Codes sent by text message
De : V (at) *nospam* nguard.LH (VanguardLH)
Groupes : comp.mobile.androidDate : 09. Mar 2024, 18:56:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Usenet Elder
Message-ID : <uruorxdsgv4w.dlg@v.nguard.lh>
References : 1
User-Agent : 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.41
The Real Bev <
bashley101@gmail.com> wrote:
Some annoying websites insist on authentication by requiring me to enter the number they send by text message. For some reason my google voice number is never identified as a real phone number and I have to use my old phone with the $10/year SIM to receive their code.
WTF? Why is the google voice number not a REAL phone number?
I use GV, too. It is considered, because it is, a VOIP service rather
than a telco or cellular carrier. The site wants to track to a device,
not to a VOIP service. The IMEI number of your phone is gold to
trackers.
"How the Pentagon Learned to Use Targeted Ads to Find Its Targets—and
Vladimir Putin"
https://www.wired.com/story/how-pentagon-learned-targeted-ads-to-find-targets-and-vladimir-putin/Physical phones are preferred for tracking. They want to track by
device, not by service. Even landlines are preferred over services. GV
operates much like a PBX or forwarding service using simultaneous ring
to call your phone(s). Sites won't know what are your devices to track
when you give them GV, OOMA, or other PBX/forwarding services. Some
sites won't let you use e-mail aliasing or forwarding services, either.
They want something more direct.