Sujet : Re: Samsung account
De : andrew (at) *nospam* spam.net (Andrew)
Groupes : comp.mobile.androidDate : 14. Mar 2024, 22:36:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <usvn4m$2cm1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Xnews/2009.05.01
Frank Slootweg wrote on 14 Mar 2024 18:27:48 GMT :
You dishonestly, 'conveniently' snip, without comment, you lose.
Now you're just trolling, Frank.
You, of all people, Frank, know RFC1855 since you ran a server yourself,
that snipping is proper & good netiquette is to quote sparingly.
*You quote only that which you're responding to.*
HINT: There is no rule, which you seem to think exists, that says
you have to quote and respond to the ENTIRE message, Frank.'
DOUBLEHINT: I ignored at first that AJL's argument required him to
treat Doctor records EXACTLY the same as Wi-Fi apps.
TRIPLEHINT: When AJL objected, I responded DIRECTLY to his objections.
QUADRUPLEHINT:
<
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt>
"quote only relevant parts"
"Content of a follow-up post should exceed quoted content."
<
https://www.learnenglish.de/improveenglish/netiquette.html>
"quote only what is necessary (delete the rest)"
<
https://blogs.onlineeducation.touro.edu/15-rules-netiquette-online-discussion-boards/>
"quote just a few key lines from their post so that others wont
have to go back and figure out which post you�re referring to."